Samsung SPH-M240 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SPH-M240 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SPH-M240 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SPH-M240 vs Samsung Exclaim
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M240-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung Exclaim-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SPH-M240 vs LG Remarq
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M240-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
LG Remarq-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SPH-M240 vs Motorola Q9m
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M240-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Motorola Q9m-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SPH-M240 vs Sanyo PRO-700
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.80 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M240-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sanyo PRO-700-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SPH-M240 vs Samsung Rant
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi vs 134 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M240-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung Rant-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SPH-M240 vs LG LX290
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M240-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
LG LX290-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SPH-M240 vs Motorola i890
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M240-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Motorola i890-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SPH-M240 vs Samsung SPH-M500
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SPH-M240-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (117 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SPH-M500-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
