Samsung SGH-S425G Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-S425G vs. Samsung SGH-T404G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-S425G vs. Samsung S390G
Samsung SGH-S425G
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-S425G vs. Samsung SCH-R455C
Samsung SGH-S425G
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-S425G vs. LG Cookie Style
LG Cookie Style
- Small dimensions (4.05 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-S425G vs. Samsung Evan C3782
Samsung Evan C3782
- Small dimensions (4.63 x 1.93 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Dual SIM card support
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-S425G vs. Samsung SGH-T401G
Samsung SGH-S425G
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Samsung SGH-T401G
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-S425G vs. Motorola EX124G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
