Samsung SGH-M620 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-M620 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-M620 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-M620 vs Samsung SGH-G800
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M620-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Samsung SGH-M620 vs Samsung Monte Slider
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 120 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M620-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
Samsung Monte Slider-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Samsung SGH-M620 vs Samsung SGH-I780
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M620-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung SGH-I780-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (177 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SGH-M620 vs Samsung SGH-B200
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M620-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-B200-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (119 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SGH-M620 vs Google Nexus S
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneSamsung SGH-M620-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Google Nexus S-specific Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SGH-M620 vs Samsung Galaxy Ace
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M620-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Ace-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
