Samsung SGH-M200 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-M200 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-M200 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-M200 vs Samsung Ego
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.81 x 0.51 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Ego-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Samsung SGH-M200 vs Samsung SGH-B220
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.81 x 0.51 inches vs 4.13 x 1.75 x 0.55 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M200-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-B220-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (135 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SGH-M200 vs Samsung SGH-M150
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.81 x 0.51 inches vs 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M200-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SGH-M150-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (116 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SGH-M200 vs Samsung S5560
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.81 x 0.51 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung S5560-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SGH-M200 vs Samsung Galaxy 5
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-M200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.81 x 0.51 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy 5-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
