Samsung SGH-G800 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-G800 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-G800 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-G800 vs LG GT400
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
Samsung SGH-G800 vs LG CF360
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung SGH-G800 vs Samsung SGH-G810
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-G800 vs Samsung SGH-M620
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Samsung SGH-G800 vs Spice Mobile S-1200
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
Samsung SGH-G800 vs Sanyo M1
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.90 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung SGH-G800 vs LG EVE
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-G800 vs altek Leo
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-G800-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment




