Samsung SGH-G800 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-G800 vs. Acer beTouch E140
Samsung SGH-G800
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Acer beTouch E140
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-G800 vs. HTC Explorer
Samsung SGH-G800
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC Explorer
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-G800 vs. Samsung Pixon12
Samsung Pixon12
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-G800 vs. LG PRADA II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches vs 0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-G800 vs. Samsung SGH-G810
Samsung SGH-G810
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (115 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-G800 vs. Motorola RAZR MAXX
Samsung SGH-G800
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola RAZR MAXX
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-G800 vs. Samsung INNOV8
Samsung SGH-G800
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung INNOV8
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (330 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
