Samsung SGH-F700 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-F700 vs. LG PRADA
Samsung SGH-F700
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
LG PRADA
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 2.12 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-F700 vs. LG Optimus L7
Samsung SGH-F700
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-F700 vs. Apple iPhone
Samsung SGH-F700
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-F700 vs. Apple iPhone 3G
Samsung SGH-F700
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 3G
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-F700 vs. Motorola i890
Samsung SGH-F700
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-F700 vs. BlackBerry Torch 9860
Samsung SGH-F700
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
BlackBerry Torch 9860
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-F700 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
Samsung SGH-F700
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

