Samsung SGH-F490 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-F490 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-F490 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-F490 vs Samsung UltraTOUCH
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.09 x 0.46 inches vs 4.33 x 2.03 x 0.50 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F490-specific Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung UltraTOUCH-specific Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-F490 vs Samsung B7722
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F490-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.09 x 0.46 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung B7722-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SGH-F490 vs Samsung Jet
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.09 x 0.46 inches vs 4.29 x 2.11 x 0.47 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F490-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Jet-specific Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
Samsung SGH-F490 vs HTC Desire S
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneSamsung SGH-F490-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.09 x 0.46 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC Desire S-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
Samsung SGH-F490 vs Samsung OmniaPRO B7610
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Samsung SGH-F490-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.09 x 0.46 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung OmniaPRO B7610-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SGH-F490 vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 8320
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-F490-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.09 x 0.46 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Curve 8320-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Bulky
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
Samsung SGH-F490 vs Nokia E51
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.09 x 0.46 inches vs 4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F490-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Nokia E51-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-F490 vs Samsung Wave II
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneSamsung SGH-F490-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.09 x 0.46 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Wave II-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
