Samsung SGH-F480 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-F480 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-F480 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-F480 vs Samsung Corby 3G S3370
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches vs 3.94 x 2.09 x 0.51 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F480-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Corby 3G S3370-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SGH-F480 vs Samsung Galaxy Ace
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F480-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Ace-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SGH-F480 vs Samsung Monte S5620
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F480-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Monte S5620-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SGH-F480 vs HTC TyTN
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F480-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
HTC TyTN-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SGH-F480 vs Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F480-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SGH-F480 vs Sony Ericsson Xperia X8
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F480-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Xperia X8-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-F480 vs LG Pop GD510
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches vs 3.85 x 1.95 x 0.44 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F480-specific Pros & Cons
none
LG Pop GD510-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-F480 vs Nokia 2630
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches vs 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F480-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
Nokia 2630-specific Pros & Cons
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.33 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
