Samsung SGH-F400 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-F400 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-F400 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-F400 vs Samsung SGH-U700 Ultra 12.1
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F400-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-F400 vs HTC TyTN
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches vs 0.86 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC TyTN-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SGH-F400 vs LG Shine
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F400-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-F400 vs Samsung SGH-F480
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F400-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-F400 vs Samsung Memoir
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F400-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-F400 vs T-Mobile Shadow
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F400-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
Samsung SGH-F400 vs Samsung SGH-U600 Ultra 10.9
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F400-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-F400 vs Samsung S7330
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-F400-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches)




