x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung SGH-E900 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung SGH-E900 Samsung SGH-E900


  • Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Desire 601 HTC Desire 601


  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-E900 Samsung SGH-E900


  • Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung E1150 Samsung E1150


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.78 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-E900 Samsung SGH-E900


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Apple iPhone 4s Apple iPhone 4s


  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Dual core processor
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches vs 4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-E900 Samsung SGH-E900


  • Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Nokia 110 Nokia 110


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-E900 Samsung SGH-E900


  • Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung SGH-i505 Samsung SGH-i505


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (162 x 176 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.90 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-E900 Samsung SGH-E900


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches vs 4.07 x 2.00 x 0.51 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-E900 Samsung SGH-E900


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches vs 4.17 x 1.94 x 0.50 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories