Samsung SGH-E250 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-E250 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-E250 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-E250 vs Samsung E2152
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.93 x 1.96 x 0.55 inches vs 4.39 x 1.80 x 0.53 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E250 vs Sony Ericsson Spiro a
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E250-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.93 x 1.96 x 0.55 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-E250 vs LG KP265
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.93 x 1.96 x 0.55 inches vs 3.78 x 1.79 x 0.65 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi vs 116 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E250 vs Samsung C3050
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.93 x 1.96 x 0.55 inches vs 3.82 x 1.86 x 0.59 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E250 vs Samsung Diva S7070
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E250 vs Nokia C1-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.93 x 1.96 x 0.55 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E250-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-E250 vs LG GU230
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.93 x 1.96 x 0.55 inches vs 4.25 x 1.89 x 0.54 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi vs 128 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E250 vs Samsung C3520
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment




