Samsung SGH-E215 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-E215 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-E215 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-E215 vs Samsung E1410
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 111 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E215-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung SGH-E215 vs Samsung SGH-T336
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E215 vs Samsung C3110
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E215-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
Samsung SGH-E215 vs Samsung Star II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E215-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-E215 vs Samsung GALAXY mini
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E215-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SGH-E215 vs Samsung M2310
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E215 vs Motorola ROKR EM28
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment




