Samsung SGH-E200 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SGH-E200 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SGH-E200 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-E200 vs Huawei U1280
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches vs 4.17 x 1.81 x 0.45 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E200-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Huawei U1280-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SGH-E200 vs Samsung Monte Bar
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches vs 4.40 x 1.85 x 0.52 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E200-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Monte Bar-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SGH-E200 vs Samsung E2152
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches vs 4.39 x 1.80 x 0.53 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E200-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Samsung E2152-specific Pros & Cons
- Built-in flashlight
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
Samsung SGH-E200 vs Samsung SGH-E200 Eco
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches vs 4.25 x 1.81 x 0.39 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E200-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SGH-E200 Eco-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (157 ppi)
Samsung SGH-E200 vs Motorola RAZR V3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches vs 3.85 x 2.08 x 0.54 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E200-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Motorola RAZR V3-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SGH-E200 vs HTC EVO 3D GSM
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneSamsung SGH-E200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC EVO 3D GSM-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- Big screen (4.30 inches)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- Dual-lens camera for capturing 3D content
- 3D display for viewing 3D content without glasses
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Bulky
Samsung SGH-E200 vs Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches vs 4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E200-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Samsung SGH-E200 vs Samsung GALAXY Gio
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SGH-E200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.38 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung GALAXY Gio-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
