Samsung SGH-C270 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SGH-C270 vs. Samsung E1195
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-C270 vs. Samsung C3560
Samsung SGH-C270
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-C270 vs. Samsung Star 3 DUOS
Samsung SGH-C270
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Star 3 DUOS
- Small dimensions (4.02 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Dual SIM card support
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-C270 vs. Samsung SGH-C260
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.77 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-C270 vs. Samsung C3520
Samsung C3520
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-C270 vs. LG 430G
Samsung SGH-C270
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
LG 430G
- Small dimensions (0.36 x 0.19 x 0.07 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SGH-C270 vs. Motorola GLEAM+
Samsung SGH-C270
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola GLEAM+
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
-
1.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
-
2.
What happens when the HTC One is overclocked to 2.0GHz?
-
3.
Watch this hilarious Lumia 920 commercial
-
4.
Rumored specs for the "rugged" Samsung Galaxy S4 reveal a different processor under the hood
