x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung SGH-A657 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung SGH-A657 Samsung SGH-A657


  • No rear camera

Samsung Xcover 271 Samsung Xcover 271


  • Water-resistant phone
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-A657 Samsung SGH-A657


  • No rear camera

Samsung B2700 Samsung B2700


  • Water-resistant phone
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches vs 0.71 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-A657 Samsung SGH-A657


  • No rear camera

Samsung B2100 Samsung B2100


  • Water-resistant phone
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches vs 0.69 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-A657 Samsung SGH-A657


  • No rear camera

Samsung Xcover 2 Samsung Xcover 2


  • Water-resistant phone
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-A657 Samsung SGH-A657


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)

Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-A657 Samsung SGH-A657


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)

Nokia 206 Nokia 206


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.94 x 0.49 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung SGH-A657 Samsung SGH-A657


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)

Nokia 301 Nokia 301


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories