Samsung SCH-i760 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SCH-i760 vs. Motorola MOTO Q 11
Samsung SCH-i760
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung SCH-i760 vs. Samsung SCH-i730
Samsung SCH-i760
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches vs 0.94 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung SCH-i760 vs. HTC Rezound
Samsung SCH-i760
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HTC Rezound
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (342 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung SCH-i760 vs. LG enV2
Samsung SCH-i760
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SCH-i760 vs. HTC Apache
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (400 MHz vs 416 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches vs 1.00 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Samsung SCH-i760 vs. LG enV3
Samsung SCH-i760
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung SCH-i760 vs. Motorola Q9h
Samsung SCH-i760
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.76 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
