Samsung SCH-U620 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SCH-U620 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SCH-U620 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SCH-U620 vs Samsung SCH-U550
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U620 vs Samsung SCH-A870
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U620 vs Pantech Jest 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U620-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Samsung SCH-U620 vs LG VX9400
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches vs 0.73 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U620 vs Samsung SCH-A930
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches vs 1.00 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U620 vs Samsung SPH-i700
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U620 vs LG Migo
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.85 inches vs 0.87 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 96 x 32 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U620-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus




