Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo vs LG Lotus Elite
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
LG Lotus Elite-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo vs Motorola GRASP
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola GRASP-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo vs Motorola Hint QA30
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola Hint QA30-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo vs Samsung Champ
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Champ-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.79 x 2.12 x 0.51 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo vs Kyocera Neo E1100
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
Kyocera Neo E1100-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo vs PCD Wrangler
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
PCD Wrangler-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.80 x 1.90 x 0.60 inches)
- Splash-proof phone
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo vs Pantech Jest 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-U440 Cleo-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
- Low resolution display (220 x 176 pixels)
Pantech Jest 2-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
