Samsung SCH-R500 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung SCH-R500 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung SCH-R500 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung SCH-R500 vs Samsung Convoy 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.85 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-R500 vs Samsung Convoy
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi vs 128 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.94 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-R500 vs Samsung SGH-Z240
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi vs 134 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-R500 vs Kyocera Deco E1000
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.77 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-R500 vs Motorola Hint QA30
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi vs 160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-R500-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung SCH-R500 vs Samsung SCH-R610
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi vs 134 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-R500-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
Samsung SCH-R500 vs Samsung Hue II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi vs 128 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-R500 vs Samsung SGH-E490
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung SCH-R500-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)




