Samsung S6700 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung S6700 vs. Samsung Primo
Samsung Primo
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S6700 vs. Samsung Ultra S
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.96 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S6700 vs. Nokia Asha 300
Nokia Asha 300
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.96 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S6700 vs. Xiaomi Mi-Two
Samsung S6700
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.96 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Xiaomi Mi-Two
- Quad core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (342 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung S6700 vs. Samsung Shark S5350
Samsung Shark S5350
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.96 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.54 x 1.84 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S6700 vs. Samsung Ch@t 322
Samsung S6700
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.96 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S6700 vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
Samsung S6700
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.96 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Ace
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
-
1.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
-
2.
What happens when the HTC One is overclocked to 2.0GHz?
-
3.
Rumored specs for the "rugged" Samsung Galaxy S4 reveal a different processor under the hood
-
4.
Alleged Samsung Galaxy S4 Active photos show rugged yet slim chassis
