Samsung S5500 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung S5500 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
Samsung S5500
- Small dimensions (3.73 x 1.81 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung GALAXY mini
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S5500 vs. Samsung Monte S5620
Samsung S5500
- Small dimensions (3.73 x 1.81 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Monte S5620
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S5500 vs. Samsung GALAXY Gio
Samsung S5500
- Small dimensions (3.73 x 1.81 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung GALAXY Gio
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 180 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S5500 vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.73 x 1.81 x 0.58 inches inches vs 4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S5500 vs. Samsung C3750
Samsung S5500
- Small dimensions (3.73 x 1.81 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S5500 vs. Samsung SGH-E950
Samsung S5500
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Samsung SGH-E950
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.73 x 1.81 x 0.58 inches inches vs 3.66 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung S5500 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III mini
Samsung S5500
- Small dimensions (3.73 x 1.81 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
More Rivals
