Samsung Replenish Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Replenish vs. Motorola XPRT
Samsung Replenish
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Replenish vs. LG Optimus S
Samsung Replenish
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
LG Optimus S
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Replenish vs. Motorola Admiral
Samsung Replenish
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Replenish vs. Kyocera Milano
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Replenish vs. Samsung Galaxy Prevail
Samsung Replenish
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Replenish vs. Samsung Transform Ultra
Samsung Replenish
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
in-depth comparison
Samsung Replenish vs. Samsung Galaxy Rush
Samsung Replenish
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
in-depth comparison

