x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Propel Pro Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Propel Pro Samsung Propel Pro


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Strive Samsung Strive


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (177 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Propel Pro Samsung Propel Pro


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Pantech Pursuit II Pantech Pursuit II


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (177 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Propel Pro Samsung Propel Pro


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Rugby III Samsung Rugby III


  • Water-resistant phone
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.8 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (177 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Propel Pro Samsung Propel Pro


  • Low pixel density screen (177 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S6 edge Samsung Galaxy S6 edge


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (577 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • 8-core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (5.59 x 2.76 x 0.28 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.28 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Propel Pro Samsung Propel Pro


  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia N86 8MP Nokia N86 8MP


  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (177 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 75 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Propel Pro Samsung Propel Pro


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

ZTE Z431 ZTE Z431


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (177 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Propel Pro Samsung Propel Pro


  • The camera lacks flash

Motorola Q9h Motorola Q9h


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (177 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories