Samsung Pixon12 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Pixon12 vs. Samsung Pixon
Samsung Pixon12
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels vs 8 megapixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Pixon12 vs. Samsung Memoir
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels vs 8 megapixels)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Pixon12 vs. Nokia N8
Samsung Pixon12
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N8
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- Slow processor (680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
in-depth comparison
Samsung Pixon12 vs. Samsung OMNIA HD
Samsung Pixon12
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels vs 8 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Pixon12 vs. Sony Ericsson Satio
Sony Ericsson Satio
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Pixon12 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
Samsung Pixon12
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi vs 306 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels vs 8 megapixels)
in-depth comparison
Samsung Pixon12 vs. Samsung GALAXY S II Plus
Samsung Pixon12
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung GALAXY S II Plus
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels vs 8 megapixels)
in-depth comparison
