x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Omnia II CDMA Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Omnia II Samsung Omnia II


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (208 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Omnia II CDMA Samsung Omnia II CDMA


  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (208 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Omnia II CDMA Samsung Omnia II CDMA


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

HTC HD mini HTC HD mini


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.27 x 0.46 inches)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (208 MB RAM vs 384 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Omnia II CDMA Samsung Omnia II CDMA


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

HTC Aria HTC Aria


  • Small dimensions (4.10 x 2.30 x 0.46 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (208 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Omnia II CDMA Samsung Omnia II CDMA


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung OmniaPRO B7330 Samsung OmniaPRO B7330


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi vs 173 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (208 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Omnia II CDMA Samsung Omnia II CDMA


  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi)

Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 Sony Ericsson Xperia X1


  • High pixel density screen (311 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (208 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Palm Treo Pro CDMA Palm Treo Pro CDMA


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi vs 181 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (208 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories