Samsung Monte Slider Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Monte Slider vs. Samsung E2600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Monte Slider vs. Samsung C3050
Samsung Monte Slider
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (100 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches inches vs 3.82 x 1.86 x 0.59 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Monte Slider vs. Samsung C3750
Samsung Monte Slider
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Monte Slider vs. Nokia C2-05
Samsung Monte Slider
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C2-05
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 200 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Monte Slider vs. Samsung Shark 3 S3550
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches inches vs 3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 200 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Monte Slider vs. LG Viewty Snap
Samsung Monte Slider
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG Viewty Snap
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches inches vs 4.25 x 2.09 x 0.49 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Monte Slider vs. Nokia 6600 slide
Samsung Monte Slider
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (100 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches inches vs 3.54 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
