Samsung Monte Slider Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Monte Slider the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Monte Slider compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Monte Slider vs Samsung E2600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Monte Slider vs Samsung C3050
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 3.82 x 1.86 x 0.59 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Monte Slider vs Sony Ericsson Spiro a
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Monte Slider-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Monte Slider vs Samsung Shark 3 S3550
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 3.77 x 1.80 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Monte Slider vs Samsung E2330
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 3.86 x 1.85 x 0.55 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Monte Slider-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Monte Slider vs Samsung E2530
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Monte Slider-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Monte Slider vs Nokia 7230 US
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Monte Slider vs Nokia 2220 slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (100 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Monte Slider-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack




