x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Monte Slider Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Monte Slider Samsung Monte Slider


  • Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Monte Slider Samsung Monte Slider


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (100 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 3.86 x 1.85 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Monte Slider Samsung Monte Slider


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (100 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 3.91 x 1.88 x 0.58 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 3.82 x 1.86 x 0.59 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 141 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Monte Slider Samsung Monte Slider


  • Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)

Samsung C3590 Samsung C3590


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Monte Slider Samsung Monte Slider


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia C3 Touch and Type Nokia C3 Touch and Type


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches vs 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (100 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Monte Slider Samsung Monte Slider


  • Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (100 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (120 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto G (2014) Motorola Moto G (2014)


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories