Samsung Lindy M5650 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Lindy M5650 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Lindy M5650 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs Samsung Corby Beat M3710
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Lindy M5650-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs Samsung S5560
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Lindy M5650-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs Samsung Corby Pro B5310R
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Lindy M5650-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs LG Shine Touch
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches vs 4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Lindy M5650-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs Samsung Corby S3650W
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches vs 4.06 x 2.22 x 0.47 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs Samsung C3750
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Lindy M5650-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs Samsung S5500
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches vs 3.73 x 1.81 x 0.58 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Lindy M5650-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs Samsung Monte S5620
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Lindy M5650-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack




