Samsung Lindy M5650 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs. Samsung C3510
Samsung Lindy M5650
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung C3510
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Samsung Lindy M5650
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs. Samsung Corby Beat M3710
Samsung Lindy M5650
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs. Samsung Corby II
Samsung Lindy M5650
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini 2
Samsung Lindy M5650
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung GALAXY mini 2
- NFC
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 176 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs. Sony Xperia tipo
Samsung Lindy M5650
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Sony Xperia tipo
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Lindy M5650 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
Samsung Lindy M5650
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung GALAXY mini
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
