x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Impact Samsung Impact


  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Mythic Samsung Mythic


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi

in-depth comparison



Samsung Impact Samsung Impact


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Samsung Freeform M Samsung Freeform M


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Impact Samsung Impact


  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Pantech Laser Pantech Laser


  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
  • Small dimensions (4.45 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Impact Samsung Impact


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Impact Samsung Impact


  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

LG Xpression C395 LG Xpression C395


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Impact Samsung Impact


  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Celkon C555 Celkon C555


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Impact Samsung Impact


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Impression Samsung Impression


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories