Samsung INNOV8 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung INNOV8 vs. Nokia E66
Samsung INNOV8
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
Nokia E66
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow processor (330 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung INNOV8 vs. Samsung OMNIA HD
Samsung INNOV8
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 198 ppi)
- Slow processor (330 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung INNOV8 vs. Sony Ericsson P1
Samsung INNOV8
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson P1
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (GPRS, UMTS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (330 MHz vs 208 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches vs 0.66 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung INNOV8 vs. LG GD900 Crystal
Samsung INNOV8
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (330 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GD900 Crystal
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung INNOV8 vs. Samsung Pixon12
Samsung INNOV8
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (330 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung Pixon12
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels vs 12.1 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung INNOV8 vs. Sony Ericsson Zylo
Samsung INNOV8
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (330 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
Sony Ericsson Zylo
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung INNOV8 vs. HTC HD2
Samsung INNOV8
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (330 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 217 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
