Samsung Gravity Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Gravity the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Gravity compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Gravity vs Samsung Gravity TXT
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gravity-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Gravity vs Samsung Gravity 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gravity-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Gravity vs Samsung SGH-T404G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gravity-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Samsung Gravity vs Huawei G6600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gravity-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
Samsung Gravity vs Samsung Gravity 3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gravity-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Gravity vs Samsung B3410
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gravity-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Samsung Gravity vs T-Mobile Sidekick
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gravity vs Samsung B3310
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment




