Samsung Gleam Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Gleam the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Gleam compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Gleam vs RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Gleam-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.55 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Samsung Gleam vs Motorola GLEAM
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gleam-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.55 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola GLEAM-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Gleam vs Sony Ericsson T707a
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.55 inches vs 3.66 x 1.97 x 0.56 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gleam-specific Pros & Cons
none
Sony Ericsson T707a-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung Gleam vs Samsung Alias 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gleam-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.55 inches)
Samsung Alias 2-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
Samsung Gleam vs LG enV3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gleam-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.55 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
LG enV3-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung Gleam vs Samsung Xcover 271
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gleam-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.55 inches)
Samsung Xcover 271-specific Pros & Cons
- Water-resistant phone
- Built-in flashlight
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Samsung Gleam vs Motorola MOTO W755
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gleam-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.55 inches)
Motorola MOTO W755-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (148 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
Samsung Gleam vs Samsung Gusto
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.88 x 1.91 x 0.55 inches vs 3.99 x 1.86 x 0.56 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Gleam-specific Pros & Cons
none
Samsung Gusto-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
