Samsung Galaxy Y User Reviews
Overal user rating
The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.
Internet7.6/10Call quality7.7/10
Battery4.9/10Reception7.2/10
Display5.8/10Build quality7.3/10
Text input5.8/10Everyday usage6.9/10
UI speed7.3/10Camera5/10
Multimedia7.4/10Alternatives
Post new review
Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of Phone Arena.
MGreaves posted on 09 Feb 2013, 08:06
Rubbish
MGreaves has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
It simply cant call anyone for more than 1 minute, the display is the worst i have ever seen, android 2.3 is ainceint, there is a "samsung" virus to try and annoy people off their cheap phones and switch to there ridiculus 700 dollar phones. Camera is broken after 7 months, battery is 1 hour if you dont use it at all, 5 minutes talk time, 2 minutes game time, and the wifi doesnt work. It will say mobile network unavailable when it gets full reception.
terreble phone. any other phone by a different manufacturer is way better.Build quality 2/10Reception 1/10Call quality 1/10Internet 2/10Multimedia 2/10Camera 1/10UI speed 1/10Everyday usage 1/10Text input 1/10Display 1/10Battery 1/10Pros
Cons
- bad screen
- low pixel density
- terryble camera
- cant call anyone
MGreaves alternatives:
1 out of 3 people found this review helpful. Do you?
ReportJunkCreek posted on 10 Dec 2012, 06:01
Nice little device for little budget
JunkCreek has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
For cheap and Android normal usage, it is best to buy it as your secondary phone or as third, forth, fifth or soon device. Had GPS, WiFi, Camera, nice sound but not loud. We can do basic smartphone and internet usage activity. So complete for it's budget.
Build quality 5/10Reception 5/10Call quality 5/10Internet 7/10Multimedia 7/10Camera 5/10UI speed 3/10Everyday usage 7/10Text input 3/10Display 3/10Battery 5/10JunkCreek alternatives:
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?
ReportNader1912 posted on 03 Nov 2012, 06:05
I don't think of it as that good after a while
Nader1912 has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
seriously. i do not recommend this for anyone apart from people who have never used or seen an android. i've had it since dec 2011. now it's nov 2012. the battery was nice at first but after 7 months mine's battery only lasted 4 hours. on wifi half an hour. on games 50 minutes (all tested at 100 % charge). screen size and resolution cause a lot of apps to get really slow and laggy. some dont even work. camera stinks.
Build quality 8/10Reception 7/10Call quality 9/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 6/10Camera 3/10UI speed 8/10Everyday usage 5/10Text input 6/10Display 3/10Battery 3/10
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?
Reportcarilotoz posted on 30 Oct 2012, 07:33
good.
carilotoz has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
it is good not very bad.
it has a an excellent processor 832.
has a responsive screeeeen not very small like the galaxy pocket.
has a bad display 133 ppi ???????!!!!!!???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Build quality 9/10Reception 8/10Call quality 9/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 6/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 8/10Text input 7/10Display 7/10Battery 7/10carilotoz alternatives:
Was this review helpful? Do you?
Reportymborrego posted on 24 Jun 2012, 08:45
Good Basic Phone
ymborrego has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review
After 2 months of having this phone all I can say is, that It works for me, even though Battery Life lasts 2 days on normal usage, and using wi-fi, playing games lasts only hours, 4 to 5 hours top, I actually reccomend this phone for a first time Android user, since it has a more basic Interface.
Build quality 8/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 7/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 7/10Display 8/10Battery 5/10Pros
- Thin & Small
- Call Quality & Reception are Great
- Fast CPU
- Music Player is awesome
Cons
- Battery Life too short
- Small Display 3.0
- 2 MP Camera
- Texting in a small Qwerty Keyboard is terrible
ymborrego alternatives:
Was this review helpful? Do you?
ReportEdwardG posted on 25 Apr 2012, 22:25
Good.. but not the better
EdwardG has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review
It's Good.. but you need understand that this phone isn't the better, if you can buy an expensive phone.. buy it!.. but.. for to be the your first smartphone.. try it ;).. nice built, poor battery.......
Build quality 9/10Reception 8/10Call quality 7/10Internet 7/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 4/10UI speed 7/10Everyday usage 7/10Text input 7/10Display 7/10Battery 4/10Pros
- Build
Cons
- Battery
- Camera
EdwardG alternatives:
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?
Reportosama posted on 21 Apr 2012, 08:29
True awesomeness
osama has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
I have had that phone for like 5 days and i compeletly love it ,it's nice to use it and the display screen aint that bad and writing in swype is really nice but the only thing that disappointed me was the camera quality it's really bad
Build quality 10/10Reception 8/10Call quality 10/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 4/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 9/10Battery 7/10Pros
- Nice keyboard
- cheapest android set with 832 processor
- small dimensions
Cons
- Bad camera
- Battery life kinda bad
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?
Reportrupeshanusuri posted on 01 Apr 2012, 21:44
Excellent value for money.
rupeshanusuri has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
The phone offers good value for money.I recommend this phone for first time android users.
UI speed is also satisfactory.
One can even play HD games after rooting and using chainfire3d.
But the small screen sometimes makes ypu wish you had a bigger one.Build quality 6/10Reception 8/10Call quality 8/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 7/10Camera 7/10UI speed 8/10Everyday usage 8/10Text input 7/10Display 7/10Battery 7/10rupeshanusuri alternatives:
2 out of 3 people found this review helpful. Do you?
Reportaymoodley posted on 22 Mar 2012, 05:12
Foxy.com
aymoodley has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
It's definitely a better idea to spend a little more and get a better phone. Cheaper is definitely not better when it comes to the Samsung Galaxy Y. I suugest that if you are planning on purchasing this phone, please do proper research on it and have a look at the recent phone reviews conducted by cellular companies.
Build quality 8/10Reception 8/10Call quality 8/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 7/10UI speed 8/10Everyday usage 3/10Text input 3/10Display 6/10Battery 3/10Pros
Cons
- Short battery life
- Faulty keypad letter selection
- Unresponsive screen
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?
ReportMarioQP posted on 14 Mar 2012, 15:13
Young and Lucid
MarioQP has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
Ok, here we go: . .
Build quality 8/10Reception 9/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 6/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 7/10Display 7/10Battery 7/10Pros
- Light and tiny
- Fast in any way! The 820 MHz is a success!
- It's really good looking
Cons
- Poor camera
- The screen is small... TOO SMALL
- The battery is so-so
MarioQP alternatives:
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?
Report
