x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Galaxy Stellar Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Galaxy Stellar Samsung Galaxy Stellar


  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (329 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Stellar Samsung Galaxy Stellar


  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Galaxy S4 Samsung Galaxy S4


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (441 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Stellar Samsung Galaxy Stellar


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

LG Optimus Exceed 2 LG Optimus Exceed 2


  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi vs 199 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 400 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Stellar Samsung Galaxy Stellar


  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Galaxy S III Samsung Galaxy S III


  • Big display (4.8 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (306 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Stellar Samsung Galaxy Stellar


  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Galaxy S4 mini Samsung Galaxy S4 mini


  • Small dimensions (4.91 x 2.41 x 0.35 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi vs 256 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Stellar Samsung Galaxy Stellar


  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Galaxy S5 Samsung Galaxy S5


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (432 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Stellar Samsung Galaxy Stellar


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Illusion Samsung Illusion


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (233 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories