Samsung Galaxy Pocket Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Pocket vs. Samsung GALAXY mini 2
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 176 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Pocket vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Pocket vs. Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Pocket vs. Samsung GALAXY Ace 2
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Pocket vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Pocket vs. Nokia Asha 311
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
