x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 5th generation Apple iPod touch 5th generation


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.24 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2 Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 4.0 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 4.0


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Core Prime Samsung Galaxy Core Prime


  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low pixel density screen (207 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung Galaxy Ace


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 311 Nokia Asha 311


  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories