Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Player 5
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 187 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Apple iPod touch 5th generation
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPod touch 5th generation
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- Dual core processor
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 4.0
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches vs 4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 158 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Apple iPod touch 4th generation
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPod touch 4th generation
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches vs 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.28 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
