x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 187 ppi)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2 Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 5th generation Apple iPod touch 5th generation


  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
  • Dual core processor
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6 Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6


  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches vs 4.52 x 2.45 x 0.38 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 158 ppi)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 4th generation Apple iPod touch 4th generation


  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches vs 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.28 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Samsung Galaxy Player 50


  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 311 Nokia Asha 311


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories