Samsung Galaxy Player 50 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Player 5
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Apple iPod touch 5th generation
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPod touch 5th generation
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 4.0
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6
Samsung Galaxy Player 50
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches vs 4.52 x 2.45 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 158 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Samsung Galaxy Player 50 vs. Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches vs 4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 158 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
