x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6


  • Small dimensions (4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)

Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2 Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (158 ppi vs 222 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6


  • Small dimensions (4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (158 ppi vs 187 ppi)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6


  • Low pixel density screen (158 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)

Apple iPod touch 4th generation Apple iPod touch 4th generation


  • High pixel densitiy screen (326 ppi)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.28 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches vs 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.28 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6


  • Small dimensions (4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 4.0 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 4.0


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (158 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6


  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches vs 4.52 x 2.45 x 0.38 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (158 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6


  • Small dimensions (4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Galaxy S Duos Samsung Galaxy S Duos


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Too little RAM memory (768 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (158 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6 Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6


  • Single-core processor
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Galaxy S II Samsung Galaxy S II


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches vs 4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (158 ppi vs 218 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories