Samsung GALAXY Fit Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung GALAXY Fit vs. Samsung GALAXY mini 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi vs 176 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung GALAXY Fit vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
Samsung GALAXY Fit
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung GALAXY Fit vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung GALAXY Fit vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung GALAXY Fit vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Samsung GALAXY Fit vs. Samsung GALAXY Ace 2
Samsung GALAXY Fit
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung GALAXY Fit vs. Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
- Dual SIM card support
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison

