x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy J1 Samsung Galaxy J1


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lots of RAM (512.0 GB RAM vs 512 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 217 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lots of RAM (512.0 GB RAM vs 768 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Samsung Galaxy Ace 3


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (512.0 GB RAM vs 1024 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 Samsung Galaxy Ace 4


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (512.0 GB RAM vs 1024 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 217 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (512.0 GB RAM vs 768 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 246 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS


  • Dual SIM card support
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (512.0 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 158 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS Samsung GALAXY Ace DUOS


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Lumia 730 Nokia Lumia 730


  • High pixel density screen (312 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lots of RAM (512.0 GB RAM vs 1024 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 312 ppi)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories