Samsung Exclaim Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung Exclaim the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung Exclaim compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung Exclaim vs Samsung Rant
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 134 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Exclaim vs Sanyo Incognito SCP-6760
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Exclaim vs LG Rumor Touch
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Exclaim-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Exclaim vs Samsung Restore
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 150 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Exclaim-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Exclaim vs Samsung Seek
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Exclaim-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Exclaim vs LG Remarq
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Exclaim-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Samsung Exclaim vs Samsung SPH-M240
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 117 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Exclaim-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung Exclaim vs Kyocera Brio
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Exclaim-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)




