x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung DoubleTime Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung DoubleTime Samsung DoubleTime


  • The camera lacks flash

Motorola BACKFLIP Motorola BACKFLIP


  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 186 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung DoubleTime Samsung DoubleTime


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung DoubleTime Samsung DoubleTime


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Captivate Glide Samsung Captivate Glide


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out ()

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung DoubleTime Samsung DoubleTime


  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

LG Genesis LG Genesis


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung DoubleTime Samsung DoubleTime


  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 245 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung DoubleTime Samsung DoubleTime


  • Single-core processor
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sharp FX Plus Sharp FX Plus


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung DoubleTime Samsung DoubleTime


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Hennessy Samsung Hennessy


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Quad core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (180 ppi vs 175 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories