x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Conquer 4G Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Conquer 4G Samsung Conquer 4G


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung Epic 4G Touch Samsung Epic 4G Touch


  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 206 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Conquer 4G Samsung Conquer 4G


  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

HTC EVO 4G HTC EVO 4G


  • HDMI connector for TV-out ()

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 217 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Conquer 4G Samsung Conquer 4G


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

HTC EVO 4G LTE HTC EVO 4G LTE


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (312 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Conquer 4G Samsung Conquer 4G


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Conquer 4G Samsung Conquer 4G


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (329 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Conquer 4G Samsung Conquer 4G


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Conquer 4G Samsung Conquer 4G


  • Low-resolution video capture

Coolpad Quattro 4G Coolpad Quattro 4G


  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Buy Accessories

Latest stories