x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Champ 3.5G Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Champ Deluxe DUOS Samsung Champ Deluxe DUOS


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.04 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches vs 4.01 x 2.17 x 0.48 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung E2652 Champ Duos Samsung E2652 Champ Duos


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.04 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches vs 3.90 x 2.13 x 0.47 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Champ 2 Samsung Champ 2


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.04 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches vs 3.78 x 2.07 x 0.48 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Y Samsung Galaxy Y


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.04 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches vs 4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Champ 3.5G Samsung Champ 3.5G


  • Small dimensions (4.04 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches)

Nokia Asha 305 Nokia Asha 305


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Champ 3.5G Samsung Champ 3.5G


  • Small dimensions (4.04 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches)

Samsung GALAXY mini Samsung GALAXY mini


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Champ 3.5G Samsung Champ 3.5G


  • Small dimensions (4.04 x 2.18 x 0.47 inches)

Samsung Monte S5620 Samsung Monte S5620


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories