x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung C6625 Samsung C6625


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung OmniaPRO B7330 Samsung OmniaPRO B7330


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 173 ppi)
  • Slow processor (393 MHz vs 528 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung C6625 Samsung C6625


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow processor (393 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung OMNIA Pro 4 Samsung OMNIA Pro 4


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 173 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung C6625 Samsung C6625


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow processor (393 MHz)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung C6625 Samsung C6625


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow processor (393 MHz)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Sony Ericsson Aspen Sony Ericsson Aspen


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung C6625 Samsung C6625


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow processor (393 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung OmniaPRO B7320 Samsung OmniaPRO B7320


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung C6625 Samsung C6625


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Nokia E63 Nokia E63


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 169 ppi)
  • Slow processor (393 MHz vs 369 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 71 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Samsung C6625 Samsung C6625


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow processor (393 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Chat Samsung Galaxy Chat


  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories