Samsung C6620 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E63
Motorola XT316
Samsung C6625
Samsung OmniaPRO B7320
Nokia E71
Nokia C3
Samsung Ch@t222

Samsung C6620 vs. Nokia E63

Samsung C6620

Lacks Wi-Fi
The camera lacks flash
Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Nokia E63

Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
Slow processor (369 MHz)
Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM)
Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 169 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
No front-facing camera
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison

Samsung C6620 vs. Motorola XT316

Samsung C6620

Lacks Wi-Fi
Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola XT316

Slow processor (600 MHz)
Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 143 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison

Samsung C6620 vs. Samsung C6625

Samsung C6620

Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung C6625

Slow processor (393 MHz)
Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

Lacks Wi-Fi
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison

Samsung C6620 vs. Samsung OmniaPRO B7320

Samsung C6620

Lacks Wi-Fi
The camera lacks autofocus
No front-facing camera
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung OmniaPRO B7320

Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
The camera lacks flash
Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison

Samsung C6620 vs. Nokia E71

Samsung C6620

Lacks Wi-Fi
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
No front-facing camera
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E71

Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches inches)

Slow processor (369 MHz)
Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 169 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

in-depth comparison

Samsung C6620 vs. Nokia C3

Samsung C6620

Lacks Wi-Fi
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
No front-facing camera
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia C3

Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison

Samsung C6620 vs. Samsung Ch@t222

Samsung C6620

Lacks Wi-Fi
Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
The camera lacks autofocus
The camera lacks flash
Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
No front-facing camera
Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Ch@t222

Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison

Samsung Galaxy S4
- Announced: 14 Mar 2013
- OS: Android 4.2.2
- Hardware: Quad core, 1900 MHz, Krait 300, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 5.0 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 13 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS
Apple iPhone 5
- Announced: 12 Sep 2012
- OS: iOS
- Hardware: Dual core, 1300 MHz, Apple Swift, 1016 MB RAM
- Display: 4.0 inches, 640 x 1136 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 8 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900), CDMA (800 1700/2100 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS EV-DO Rev.A EV-DO Rev.B
Samsung GALAXY Note II
- Announced: 29 Aug 2012
- OS: Android 4.1.2 4.1.1
- Hardware: Quad core, 1600 MHz, ARM Cortex-A9, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 5.5 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 8 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 35 hours of Talk Time, 980 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 21.1 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS
HTC One
- Announced: 19 Feb 2013
- OS: Android 4.1.2
- Hardware: Quad core, 1700 MHz, Krait 300, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 4.7 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 4 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900), CDMA (800 1900)
- Data: LTE HSPA (unspecified) UMTS EDGE GPRS
Sony Xperia Z
- Announced: 07 Jan 2013
- OS: Android 4.1.2
- Hardware: Quad core, 1500 MHz, Krait, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 5.0 inches, 1080 x 1920 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 13.1 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 11 hours of Talk Time, 550 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS
Google Nexus 4
- Announced: 29 Oct 2012
- OS: Android 4.2.2 4.2.1 4.2
- Hardware: Quad core, 1500 MHz, Krait, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 4.7 inches, 768 x 1280 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 8 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 15.3 hours of Talk Time, 390 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS
LG Optimus G
- Announced: 28 Aug 2012
- OS: Android 4.1.2 4.0.4
- Hardware: Quad core, 1500 MHz, Krait, 2048 MB RAM
- Display: 4.7 inches, 768 x 1280 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 13 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 15 hours of Talk Time, 335 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE HSPA (unspecified) UMTS EDGE GPRS
Nokia Lumia 920
- Announced: 05 Sep 2012
- OS: Windows Phone 8
- Hardware: Dual core, 1500 MHz, Krait, 1024 MB RAM
- Display: 4.5 inches, 768 x 1280 pixels, Capacitive Touchscreen
- Camera 8.7 megapixels, 1920x1080 (1080p HD) video
- Battery: 17 hours of Talk Time, 400 hours of Stand-by
- Technology: GSM (850 900 1800 1900)
- Data: LTE Cat3 Downlink 100 Mbit/s LTE Cat3/4 Uplink 50 Mbit/s HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s UMTS EDGE GPRS

Carriers

Manufacturers

Phone tools

Carriers

Manufacturers

Tablet tools

Phone Links

Samsung C6620 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Common for both Pros & Cons

Popular stories

Hot Phones

Interesting stories

Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA

All from Google I/O 2013

Nokia Lumia 925 - thinnest WP8 smartphone to date

The forbidden fruit: 7 great apps Google does not allow on Play store

Google I/O 2013 is coming, but what will it bring?

10 great personalization apps for Android

Verizon's Nokia Lumia 928 vs AT&T's Nokia Lumia 920

Nokia Lumia 928 official as Verizon exclusive