Samsung C5212 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung C5212 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung C5212 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung C5212 vs Samsung C3322
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung C5212-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung C5212 vs Samsung C3752
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung C5212 vs Samsung E2152
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung C5212 vs Samsung E2652 Champ Duos
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung C5212 vs Samsung C3212 Duos
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung C5212 vs Samsung B5722
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung C5212 vs Samsung C6112
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung C5212 vs Motorola MOTOKEY MINI
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 176 x 144 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment




