Samsung C5130 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung C5130 vs. Nokia C2-01
Samsung C5130
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C2-01
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5130 vs. Sony Xperia go
Samsung C5130
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Xperia go
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Small dimensions (4.37 x 2.37 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Water-resistant phone
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Samsung C5130 vs. Nokia 7230
Samsung C5130
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5130 vs. Nokia C2-02
Nokia C2-02
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5130 vs. Nokia 2600 classic
Nokia 2600 classic
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5130 vs. Samsung Galaxy Xcover
Samsung C5130
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Xcover
- Water-resistant phone
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (158 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5130 vs. Nokia C2-03
Nokia C2-03
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison

