Samsung C5010 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung C5010 vs. Samsung E3210
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.53 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5010 vs. Nokia C2-01
Samsung C5010
- Small dimensions (4.53 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5010 vs. Sony Ericsson P1
Samsung C5010
- Small dimensions (4.53 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson P1
- Slow processor (208 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs GPRS, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5010 vs. Sony Ericsson Cedar
Samsung C5010
- Small dimensions (4.53 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5010 vs. Nokia C1-01
Samsung C5010
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.53 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5010 vs. Samsung Hero E3213
Samsung C5010
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.53 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.44 x 1.83 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C5010 vs. Samsung E2121B
Samsung C5010
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.53 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.11 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
