Samsung C3520 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung C3520 vs. Samsung C3560
Samsung C3520
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C3520 vs. Samsung GT-S3600
Samsung C3520
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C3520 vs. Samsung E2530
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C3520 vs. Motorola GLEAM+
Samsung C3520
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C3520 vs. Motorola GLEAM
Samsung C3520
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C3520 vs. Samsung E1195
Samsung C3520
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Samsung C3520 vs. Samsung S5511
Samsung C3520
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.72 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
