x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Blue Earth Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Star II Samsung Star II


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blue Earth Samsung Blue Earth


  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3


  • Big display (6.3 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (74.27 %)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 233 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blue Earth Samsung Blue Earth


  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

BLU Studio 7.0 BLU Studio 7.0


  • Big display (7.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (600 x 1024 pixels)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 170 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blue Earth Samsung Blue Earth


  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)

LG Mini LG Mini


  • High pixel density screen (306 ppi)
  • Small dimensions (4.02 x 1.86 x 0.39 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blue Earth Samsung Blue Earth


  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Google Nexus 5 Google Nexus 5


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (445 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blue Earth Samsung Blue Earth


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Alcatel OneTouch 3020 Alcatel OneTouch 3020


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 141 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 220 x 176 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blue Earth Samsung Blue Earth


  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Preston Samsung Preston


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories