PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Blade S5600v Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Blade S5600v Samsung Blade S5600v


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S Samsung Galaxy S


  • Fast processor (1000 MHz)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blade S5600v Samsung Blade S5600v


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Wave II Samsung Wave II


  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
  • Fast processor (1000 MHz)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blade S5600v Samsung Blade S5600v


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Samsung Monte S5620 Samsung Monte S5620


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blade S5600v Samsung Blade S5600v


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung Galaxy Ace


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blade S5600v Samsung Blade S5600v


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S III mini Samsung Galaxy S III mini


  • Dual core processor
  • Fast processor (1000 MHz)
  • Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Blade S5600v Samsung Blade S5600v


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G


  • Dual core processor
  • Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
  • Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Preston Samsung Preston


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Hot Phones

  • Samsung Galaxy S4Samsung Galaxy S4
  • Apple iPhone 5Apple iPhone 5
  • Samsung GALAXY Note IISamsung GALAXY Note II
  • HTC OneHTC One
  • Sony Xperia ZSony Xperia Z
  • Google Nexus 4Google Nexus 4
  • LG Optimus GLG Optimus G
  • Nokia Lumia 920Nokia Lumia 920